COPYPASTECHRONICLES
Published file

The dossiers · The filing cabinet

Every file.
Worst first.

Each folder below is a complete measurement of one agency's entire client book: the same instruments, applied the same way, to every business on the roster. Pull any file; every figure inside can be recomputed from the public method sheet.

3 files in the cabinet 3 published 1,644 businesses measured 240,064 searches from real spots
ECP-710 EyeCarePro · Optometry Filed
CASE ECP-710Vertical: eye care

EyeCarePro

1,448 eye-care practices measured · the largest book in the cabinet

Finding of record · The map

779 of 1,448 practices, 53.8%, are not in the top three for “glasses near me” on their own map. 567 of the 1,448 grids are outright led by a national retail chain.

Finding of record · The site

1,232 of 1,448 fail a majority of the six site checks, and not one of the 1,448 passes all six. 1,151 sit on the same template; 1,434 load slower than Google's 2.5-second bar.

Also on the record

56 practices are never found anywhere on their own 121-pin grid at all. The typical practice's site takes 9.3 seconds to show its main content on a phone, against Google's 2.5-second limit.

Read it yourself

One phrase, 1,448 grids, 121 pins each. The dossier holds every practice's own map, rank distribution, and speed readings, row by row.

Filed 2026-08-07 to 2026-09-03 · Amended 2026-09-04 · 1,448 practices · 1,609 grid scans · 175,208 map points · 1,448 speed tests · phrase: “glasses near me”
Pull this file →
DB-097 DemandBoost · Chiropractic Filed
CASE DB-097Vertical: chiropractic

DemandBoost

97 chiropractic clients measured · the first file in the cabinet

Finding of record · The map

36 of the 95 clinics scanned are invisible: zero top-3 appearances anywhere on their own map. 46 are partial. Only 13 hold a winning share of the phrase.

Finding of record · The product

The median client site takes 10.5 seconds to show its main content on a phone, against Google's 2.5-second bar. Median phone PageSpeed: 48/100.

Also on the record

The median clinic sits at position #8.9 on its own map. Two clients on the roster have not had their maps measured yet; their sites were still speed-tested.

Read it yourself

Every clinic's own grid, standings segment, and speed readings are in the file, with the 13 winners examined as closely as the 36 invisible.

Filed 2026-08-05 · 97 clinics · 95 contested-phrase + 36 niche-phrase grid scans · 97 speed tests · 83 site audits
Pull this file →
RRH-146 RankReallyHigh · Dispensaries Filed
CASE RRH-146Docket number, not a count · Vertical: cannabis retail

RankReallyHigh

99 dispensary clients · 280 storefronts measured · sifted from 313 roster candidates

Finding of record

275 of 280 storefronts never appear on their own map for “weed near me”: the term worth double. Only 5 rank at all.

The tell

On “dispensary near me”, the term worth half, 139 of 280 storefronts reach the top 3. On “weed near me”, the term worth double, 5 of the same 280 do. The scans found these storefronts ranking on the smaller term and absent on the bigger one. Ask Rank Really High which phrase the retainer targets.

Filed 2026-08-09 · Amended 2026-08-30 · 280 storefront map scans · 33,880 map points · one phrase, “weed near me”
Pull this file →
Cabinet updated 2026-09-04 Next filing: in the works How a file gets made → Provider not here? Request a file →

Passed · The other drawer

Agencies that passed.
None yet.

The rule of the desk: an agency that passes is not put on the site; an agency that fails is published in full, every client. 0 of the 3 books measured so far cleared the bar, which is why this drawer is empty and the three above are not.

The bar At least 70% of the book passes all 3 tests Found in Google's top 3 on the phrase its customers type Main content on a phone inside Google's 2.5 second bar Mobile PageSpeed 50 or better
ECP-710 · EyeCarePro · against the bar

3 of 1,448 practices pass all three tests: 0.2% of the book, against 70%. 669 are in the top 3, 733 clear the PageSpeed line, 7 load inside the bar. 7 had no speed reading and count as failing it.

DB-097 · DemandBoost · against the bar

0 of 97 clinics pass all three tests: 0% of the book, against 70%. 13 hold a winning share of the phrase, the book's own top verdict, 46 clear the PageSpeed line, 0 load inside the bar. 2 were never map-scanned and count as failing the map test.

RRH-146 · RankReallyHigh · against the bar

0 of 99 clients pass all three tests: 0% of the book, against 70%. 5 are in the top 3, 6 clear the PageSpeed line, 1 loads inside the bar. 1 had no storefront to scan and 22 had no speed reading; all count as failing.

Unreadable counts as failed: a client whose map was never scanned fails the map test, a client with no PageSpeed reading fails both speed tests, and the denominator is the whole book. Every per-client row behind these counts is in the files above.

In one of these books?

Your listing is in the file.
Come get it.

For their clients

See your own listing.

If your provider is in this cabinet, your business was measured. Your map, where Google placed you at every spot searched around your address, your phone speed test: free to read, right now, in the file. When you want the numbers to change, the free audit, a second opinion, is one click away: 15 minutes to walk your data until it is fully understood, or a full hour with a deeper audit prepared before the call and guidance on finding a company that will actually support you, whether that is us or not. An open offer, never a hidden pitch.

Find your listingBook a free audit

For the agencies

Dispute the data.

Every figure in every file is checkable. Find an error and we correct it on the record, with a note saying so.

Challenge a figure

Independent of every agency it measures: this desk is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or compensated by any agency named in these files, and nobody named in a file can pay to change one. It is operated by a competitor. The desk's owner runs competing marketing agencies and the software stack they run on, and the free audit is open to any business that reads its file and wants it fixed. A marketing-analysis publication; no legal proceeding exists or is implied. The businesses named in each file are the injured party, not the accused.